Current News

Loading...

~ The Rainfish Chronicles ~

This BLOG functions as my little cyber-island for relaxation, rumination and social intercourse. From time to time, I will also publish some of my essays, art work, poems, prose, and political criticisms -- as well as a few of my philosophical dissertations. Email: rainfish.2000@gmail.com

Contributors

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Beyond Basketball and Bigotry - Workplace Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation - NYTimes.com


"Congress has a duty to stop dawdling and approve a strong bill. In the meantime, President Obama, a supporter of ENDA, can take a significant step toward ending discrimination in the workplace by issuing an executive order barring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity by federal contractors. He has the power to protect millions of American workers, and it is about time he used it."

(Click on link below to read the full article)

Beyond Basketball and Bigotry - Workplace Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation - NYTimes.com

Thursday, January 10, 2013

UPDATE: Obama Inauguration Committee Pulls Their Collective Heads Out of Their Collective Posteriors and Rejects Homophobic Pseudo-Christian Fascist Shaman (Rev. Louis Giglio) from Participating in Presidential Inaugural Ceremony.
"Minister With Anti-gay History Chosen for Inauguration Ceremony"

,,,from The Advocate   (click on the headline above to read the original article)

My Take on It....

Apparently the Rick Warren fiasco, four years ago when Obama moronically invited that Bible-Nazi to give a similar inane invocation at his 2009 inauguration, wasn't enough of an insult to the GLBT community which overwhelming supported this jackass's re-election -- so Obama imagines he needs a second shot at being an ungrateful pig to the very same people who saved his ungrateful bacon from the frying pan of defeat in November 2012.    Way to go, Obama! A real class act.    

~ Rainfish  2013

Friday, December 21, 2012

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

~ Who watches the Watchers?"~

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? This a Latin phrase from the Roman poet Juvenal, variously translated as: "Who watches the watchmen?"
"Who watches the watchers?"... "Who will guard the guards?"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quis_custodiet_ipsos_custodes%3F



Friday, November 23, 2012

As Another Mitt Stain in the Underwear of History Fades Away into Obscurity

Angry-Mitt-Reddit.jpg
All pumped up and no place to go!


Check out the cool captions some readers came up with on Bilerico, click on link below:
http://www.bilerico.com/2012/11/old_man_mitt_caption_this.php

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Obama Wins

Obama Wins... now let us hope that he grows a backbone in his second term.

Friday, May 11, 2012

UPDATE: Obama "Personally" Believes that Same-sex Couples Should Be Able to Marry -- but, Only If the Mob Approves

Well, technically, Obama’s stance is pretty much like that of the current Republican Gov. of New Jersey. Obama believes that (unlike his parents’ interracial marriage) that “the states should decide” if millions of GLBT Americans can past the popularity contest enough to secure their equal rights. That should really please those people pushing to amend their state constitutions to exclude us. It should also negate the arguments on our side for overturning Prop 8 in California. A stupid, really stupid thing for Obama to needlessly add to his “declaration” of half-assed support.

Fortunately, President Eisenhower (in the 1950s) and President Johnson (mid 1960s) weren’t like President Obama or we’d probably still have segregated schools and lunch-counters in the South. You don’t leave civil rights up to the mob to decide.

Obama just can’t open his mouth without some kind of stupid dropping out of it. He should have just left it at “I support marriage equality” without adding…well, if the mob decides it is OK with them.

He better clarify soon. Already, people are starting to see his “great endorsement” as less than genuine. He substituted “god’s in the mix” with …the “mob should be in the mix”.

How loathsome.

Friday, May 04, 2012

Obama and the Democrats Are Not Automatically Entitled to Our Votes

     Hmmmm, sorry to be a tad pessimistic but didn’t a little thing called Prop 8 get passed by a large herd of anti-equality swine during a “high Democratic turnout” in California when (“Gawd is in the mix…”) anti-marriage-equality Obama last ran for President? High turn-out often means the moronic haters in both parties turn out as well. I don’t expect some of Obama’s low-rent homophobic followers to behave like decent human beings and be any more accepting this time than they were in California in 2008 as long as Obama stays mum on the issue of equality, thus giving tacit approval to bigotry. A benign bigot is still a bigot, and in many ways the worst kind of bigot. They are the ones who pretend to be your ally while manipulating you towards their own ends which rarely has your best interest at heart.

     But, what the hell, the California anti-gay bigots in the Democratic party, November 2008,  just did what Obama told them to do. After all, our enemies used endless robocall recordings of Obama’s own vomitable “marriage is between a man and woman because God is in the mix” homophobia pandering insensitive remarks right before the election to appeal to hateful pseudo-christian bible-thumpers in the Democratic party -- especially in the racial minority Democratic communities.

     If Obama does not actually become the “fierce advocate” for GLBT rights he (dishonestly) claims to be and if Obama does not unequivocally support our full equality as human beings and as American citizens, then he does not deserve a second term. No other constituency in the Democratic Party would tolerate as much betrayal as we have. Very few in the Black community, the Asian community, the Hispanic and Native American Communities nor registered female voters in the Democratic party would so cheerfully suffer the casual indifference and even outright hostile backtracking on campaign promises that we in the GLBT community have been asked to accept as a necessary evil in order to inoculate Democratic politicians from the appearance of looking too progressive and upsetting the status quo (which is actually begging to be changed in America). 

     Enough is enough. Obama and the Dems must EARN our votes and work hard for it — just like they do for everybody else’s vote. No more free rides for the Democrats and for Obama. Pay like everyone else. Work for it. If they didn’t need us, they wouldn’t even bother with us. Now, make them tally-up or tell them to shove off.

     No marriage equality plank in the Democratic Platform at the DNC Convention should equal NO vote for any more blue-dog Democrats or any Dem who does not support us fully. To those who say that there are more "pressing matters" and "higher priorities" than the equal rights of fellow Americans, to those people I would ask: Do you not value your family above all others? If so, then how heartless do you have to be in order not to understand how much we value our partners, spouses and children as well. We have families too.  There are no other "pressing matters" nor "higher priorities" that could even come close to trumping that special relationship we have for our loved ones too. That should be easy to understand for anyone who has ever loved another human being.

     This time, no statement of unequivocal support for full marriage equality from Obama in his acceptance speech this time — then just say “No vote for you”... Adios…you’re on your own…just like you said to us after we put you in office the first time in 2008. The first same-sex marriages occurred when the Democrats were a minority in the federal government, and it will not end if they do not keep hold of the reins of power which they have so ineptly employed. The Democrats can go down in history as being on the side of what is fair and correct or they can ignore our struggle at their own political peril and be forever burdened with the legacy of political cowardice and historical irrelevancy.

     Ask yourself this: when they say NO to us, (just like the Dems did when they had majority control of Congress for the first two years), then don’t we have an obligation to our own personal dignity as human beings to say NO to them in return? Where is our leverage otherwise? There is no incentive to change unless you force the issue. That’s a fact. 

     We have to stop acting like mindless lemmings and frightened rabbits. I am not going to let the Democrats use the Republican Boogie Man to scare me into voting for them again. Never again. The Democrats have to earn my vote and earn my support by demonstrable and tangible legislative action and unabashed support, from the President on down, with utmost respect for my inalienable rights of citizenship. How can anyone ask for less?

     They had that opportunity (2008-2010), and they just took us for granted. Now, it is up to Obama and the Dems to convince me and my partner of over 37 years (as well as the millions of my brothers and sisters in the GLBT community) that Obama and the Democrats deserve a second chance. The burden of proof is on them. They do not have a god-given right to my vote nor the millions of other votes in the GLBT community. They must earn it!

(C) Bud Evans, 2012

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

We Are Married....Let No On Put Asunder

A Personal Essay by Bud Evans

My spouse and I were married on September 13, 2004 in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. We have been together for more than thirty years. When we arrived back home in Kansas, the sky did not fall; dairy cows did not stop producing milk, and gravity was still intact -- although common sense and common decency seemed to have left our segment of the planet under the seemingly endless Kansas prairie sky. Yes, we got the expected "Welcome Back Home to the Good ol' USA!" reception alright to which we've sadly grown accustomed as Gay and Lesbian Americans.


For months, the vile malevolent specter of our very own local home-grown Kansas State Anti-Equality "Heterosexuals Only" so-called Marriage Amendment hung over our heads like the shadowy silhouette of a cowardly mugger ready to strike in ambush from a dark alley. Finally, in early April 2005, a Kansas lynch-mob, drunk with power and prejudice, at last had their little necktie party and strung up our Bill of Rights in the public square of totalitarianism. Apparently, American neo-fascists aren't satisfied with just being the insufferable bully on the international block, they must also have their pound of flesh at home too.

So what is so surprising about this scenario? Obviously there is not enough conflict in the world, so malicious malcontents in Kansas, as well as throughout most of the US, feel the need to stir up the flames of division even more. All of this brings to mind my saddest and most sustained observation concerning the United States in general. It is in regard to her citizenry's constantly evolving contempt for other Americans. Overall, it is Mankind's greatest single flaw too. But in the USA it is the perversion of Christian fellowship and tolerance that is being twisted into a pseudo-religious/right-wing political dogma of dissimulation and group-hate which will be the next great stain on America.

Political gay-bashing and religion-based bigotry has quickly become this new century's equivalent of racism, gender inequality and ethnic strife. Fanatical homophobia has been effortlessly revived and poisonously retooled from the last century’s panoply of prejudices so eagerly embraced in these perpetually un-United States. Once again, the drama is much the same -- only the characters on the stage are played by different actors.

As this tragedy unfolds, those whose duty it is to uphold America’s promise of equality once again turn a blind eye to this country’s absolute assurances of equal justice. How did this nation’s immutable guarantees of liberty degenerate into such an arrogant and heartless popularity contest in America? If you don’t like your neighbor, just simply write them out of the Constitution. Is that it? Is that all it takes to make them disappear? Just fashion a paper noose out of group-specific malicious laws and then lynch your neighbor on a gallows once called the Bill of Rights. Is that the level of barbarity to which we have regressed in America?

No, I did not expect homophobes to throw rice at our wedding, but occasionally, albeit foolishly, I expect a modicum of class from people I do not know -- such as the simple civility of minding one’s own business. I certainly do not appreciate strangers meddling in my personal affairs; especially when it concerns my marriage. That is not only bad manners, but it is truly beneath contempt.

So, unless Canada's Marriage Laws or the few Marriage Equality U.S. "free" States fair laws are changed to reflect America's narrow-minded contempt for her own most vulnerable citizens, then my marriage will stand in at least a few zones of freedom in the U.S. as well as elsewhere abroad where equality actually means something. And there is nothing any thug in the guise of religion or government can do about it. No amount of hatred for my spouse and me will ever un-marry us. I am confident that those miscreants who envy and despise our joyful union, as well as those unethical politicians who seek political power by inciting a mob mentality in the general public, will not be looked upon favorably by history nor by future generations.

The truth is that decent people elevate themselves by their own achievements and talents; not by standing on the backs of others who are least able to defend themselves. It's a very sad commentary on modern society, as well as on this really not-so-Christian country after all, that people will still do to others what they would not tolerate having done to them. That is the classic definition of a fascist. And that is certainly not what either The Founding Fathers or Christ would have envisioned for this not-yet-great nation.

Jesus who had embraced the disenfranchised, and who had walked amongst the outcasts of society, would weep today for what is done in his name. Equally shameful is the disrespect shown to the drafters of our Bill of Rights who took great pains to protect the "inalienable rights" of the less politically powerful against the tyranny of the majority. Just try to keep in mind those words: "Liberty and Justice for All..." and "That which you do unto the least among you, you do unto me." And according to all belief systems which respect the dignity of Humankind, whether secular or religious in nature, that mandate is simply this: All people are created equal in all ways and they are endowed with the same inherent rights, in all things, as all others -- there are no exceptions. Too bad some people still refuse to see it that way.

Bigotry has always had a peculiar way of eviscerating virtue when truth becomes particularly inconvenient in advancing petty prejudices and an anti-social agenda. Whether one makes a religion out of politics (such as in Nazi Germany or in Communist regimes) or fabricates politics from religion (such as fundamentalist deity-based totalitarianism anywhere on Earth) the end result is the same. The end result is intolerance, and that is the nexus of most human strife and suffering on this planet since time immemorial.

America owes a birthright of equality in all things, great or small, under the legal umbrella of citizenship which she extends to all of her children. No one's personal religious, ethical, political or any other belief system can ever be allowed to dictate which Americans should have rights and which ones should not. If that is not anathema to the revolutionary spirit of this country and an affront to our Bill of Rights, then nothing is.

The courage to stand up for the most vulnerable citizens among us against institutional and popular prejudice is a rare act of both bravery and virtue. People of good will, working together, perhaps can someday make America a shining example of a Constitutional Republic that keeps its solemn promise of equality for all. Maybe we can remind others that this nation’s guarantee of individual liberty would never allow one faction to ever vote away another citizen’s civil rights in a thoughtless expression of group-hate. I still believe that there are good and fair people in this country. But considering the lessons of the past, I hope we don't have to wait for the next generation to grow up in order to find them.

Yes, contrary to the presuppositions of inculcated hate and politically manipulated hysteria, there really is room enough at the matrimonial table for every consenting, non-related, pair of adult human beings who wish to marry in this world -- regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, politics, gender identity or sexual orientation. It is obvious to any student of history that loving, mutually supportive same-sex romantic relationships are as old as Mankind. It has always been so and will continue to be so as long as there is a human race.

Let us also not forget that the civil rights of Gays and Lesbians are protected in most of the industrialized Western world. In those truly civilized nations, same-sex oriented individuals can be open and honest about their orientation. Even in this country, which has such a long and shameful history on the issue of human rights, homosexual intimate relationships are just as legally protected under the U.S. Constitution as heterosexual intimate relationships -- as wisely decided by the Supreme Court in the Lawrence -vs- Texas decision on June 26, 2003.

Currently, the personal lives of tens of millions of Gay and Lesbian Americans are the bloody battlegrounds where this never-ending war against civil rights is being fought. It is a war that perennially pits progress and egalitarianism against the forces of ignorance and maliciousness. We may lose many battles to those foes who divide this great house against itself -- which we call America -- but ultimately we will win the final war against the enemies of human dignity and freedom. Of that I have no doubt.

Those who fanatically and sanctimoniously wave the banner of "tradition" are in reality only selfishly trying to protect their own special status at the expense of others. Obviously, if tradition was always such a virtuous thing to uphold we’d still have slavery; women wouldn't have the right to vote, and America would have a king.

The horrors of human bondage are most often conceived and perpetuated by using that contemptible excuse of upholding the self-serving status quo. Unquestionably, when tradition is used as justification to oppress others it becomes a thing of evil and an enemy of civilization. Old notions and elitists traditions must yield to inclusiveness and egalitarianism if peace is ever to be realized and a stable society maintained.

A hallmark of civilization is marriage, and marriage is both a binding oath of mutual loyalty and a personal contract which clearly details responsibilities and rights entered into between two romantically involved individuals who pledge to share their lives with one another. That very same institution belongs to all loving, non-related, adult couples. No apartheid-like system of separate tables (i.e. civil unions, domestic partnerships, etc.) will ever suffice. To deny same-sex couples who are also engaged in constitutionally protected, intimate, mutually supportive relationships the same protections and rights that many married heterosexual couples take so easily for granted is an affront to human dignity and an assault on American principles of fairness.

Too many brave and good citizens, Gay and Straight alike, have fought and died on too many bloody battlefields so that all people can partake of freedom. No one should belittle their ultimate sacrifice by parceling out equality as if it were their own special gift to give to a favored segment of society. I truly believe (just as I previously stated in an essay I wrote which appeared in the Kansas City Star) that there is more than enough room at the same table of marriage for each of us who wish to take on all the responsibility it demands, as well as reap its rewards. As tempestuous as marriage sometimes is, it most often provides for couples pledged to one another for life, be they heterosexual or same-sex couples, the only real promise of a safe harbor in which to lay anchor and to protect their most precious cargo -- each other.

We too have sworn an oath -- to have and to hold ‘till death do us part. My spouse and I made that promise to each other officially on September 13, 2004 when we were finally, legally allowed to be married in a country to the north which respects human dignity and individual liberty. Although, I still can remember that one cold winter night on January 10th, 1975, when Bill and I first met -- we were just kids in our early twenties then. We also made that pledge, albeit unofficially, to one another. Now as then, in good times and in bad times; forsaking all others; ‘till death do us part; let no one put asunder.

It means just as much to us today as then. And perhaps just a little bit more, because at least a few more compassionate people and a few more civilized nations are finally starting to respect our right to be recognized as a family at last. They know, as we do, that love is the most important ingredient that makes a family. Families can’t exist without it. All kinds of families spring into existence because of it. That is the bedrock of marriage. Nothing else is required except devotion -- plus the courage to fight for the ones you love in the face of adversity. That is what actually makes a family. And, in case anyone forgets, that is what marriage is truly all about.

(C) Bud Evans 2006 & 2010

[originally published in 2006 and then revised in 2010 to reflect the growing number of Marriage Equality States which have joined the 21st Century by rejecting anti-GLBT bigotry as an official state policy]

(Bud Evans is a studio artist and writer who lives with his partner, Bill, for over thirty-five years who has also been his spouse since September 13, 2004 when they were legally married in Vancouver, B.C., Canada)

Monday, July 25, 2011

Spot-on Political Analysis by Crustybastard


~ From a very insightful blogger by the handle of Crustybastard ~

(you might want to cover your eyes if the language bothers you, but if you don't, you might actually learn something very insightful about how politics really works in this county)

His delightful blog can be found at: http://thecrustybastard.blogspot.com/


by "the crustybastard"

[The original post was addressed to a poster by the handle of "Spike" on Queerty]

@Spike:

The purpose of third-parties is not necessarily to get the third-party candidate elected (although that might be nice.) The purpose of third-parties is to create a correcting force on an unresponsive major party.

For example, Ross Perot’s nontrivial support from the electorate derived principally from fiscally conservative “classical republicans” who had the sense to recognize that Mr. Perot was correct that the short-term job destruction caused by “free-trade agreements” would lead to a long-term economic downturn caused by toxic unemployment, which would lead to massive housing devaluation, which would lead to lender-hoarding, which would lead to prolonged stagflation.

You know — the perfect shitstorm we’ve been wallowing in since 2008?

Oh, and — having evidently not learned a goddam thing — the current president is promoting yet more “free-trade agreements,” because despite the fact that none of those treaties has ever failed to weaken the American job market and depress wages, this one will surely be the key to employment and economic recovery…this time.

::eyeroll::

Likewise, Ralph Naders’ nontrivial support from the electorate derived principally from socially liberal progressives who had the sense to recognize that Mr. Nader was correct that Democrats were doing nothing to rein in the runaway power of corporate oligarchs and the military-industrial complex who seem determined to convert the middle-class into impoverished serfs desperate for any opportunity…even the opportunity to be a bullet-sponge.

You know — the perfect shitstorm we’ve been wallowing in since 2001?

Oh, and — having evidently not learned a goddam thing — the current president has bent over backwards to accommodate and guarantee the ongoing expansion of corporate and the military power because, besides inevitable relentless fascism, what could possibly go wrong in a country where the military and private corporations are the principle forces determining public policy?

::eyeroll::

I realize that [a] steadfast partisan streak makes it difficult to understand that some issues are more complex than “blue side good, red side bad!”

But you might at least fucking try once in a while.


(c) the crustybastard, 2011


(the original post can be found at: http://www.queerty.com/breaking-obama-supports-doma-repeal-20110719/)

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

DOMA and DADT: Twins of Injustice

(illustration attribution: Kevin Moore @2004 ~ http://incontemptcomics.com/)


...an essay by "Bud" E. Lewis Evans


DOMA and DADT are conjoined like Siamese Twins. Both may survive the legal scalpel of judicial surgery, but one or both might die in the process as well.

If DADT appeal goes forth, that could negatively impact and set a very bad precedent in DOMA if the Supreme Court finds that the Gay and Lesbian community is not entitled to "heightened scrutiny" and 14th Amendment equal protection or even Fifth Amendment due process protections in DADT. In view of those consequences, DOMA should have gone first as the Supreme Court has historically sided with the military on administrative proceedings.
Besides, Justice Kagan already has stated that she will probably recuse herself since DADT was argued in federal court while she was solicitor general and before she joined the Supreme Court. That alone just breaks the "liberal" majority (if Anthony Kennedy joins in) of the court on this one.

By the way, Elena Kagan (for all you Democratic loyalists who think that Democratic federal court appointees are referable to Republicans appointed judges such as Anthony Kennedy who wrote the majority decisions in Lawrence -v- Texas (striking down the sodomy laws) and in Romer -v- Evans (striking down anti-gay Amendment 2 in Colorado) ...just remember what Ellen Kagan stupidly said during her confirmation hearing about DOMA.

Kagan said: "There is no federal constitutional right to same-sex marriage."

---------------------

According to Keen News Service:

"In Perry v. Schwarzenegger, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management, Massachusetts v. Health and Human Services (DOMA), and in Log Cabin Republicans v. U.S., and Witt v. U.S. (DADT). If Kagan recuses herself from any of these cases, the probability for a tie is the best the LGBT community can hope for in any of these cases. Rather than pinning hopes on Justice Anthony Kennedy to serve as a swing vote to victory, pro-gay attorneys will be desperate to persuade Kennedy in order to maintain a status quo.

When there’s a tie in the Supreme Court, the lower court ruling stands but applies only to that federal circuit.

So, if the 9th Circuit agrees with District Court Judge Vaughn Walker that California’s same-sex marriage ban is unconstitutional and the Yes on 8 supporters of Proposition 8 appeal to the Supreme Court, the best gay civil rights supporters could hope for — given the current ideological make-up of the court — is to preserve the 9th Circuit ruling for the nine 9th Circuit states.

On the other hand, if the 9th Circuit should disagree with Walker’s ruling, perhaps the worst outcome would likely be that banning same-sex marriage would be considered constitutional in only those nine states."

--------------------

Also during her confirmation hearing, Kagan was asked about the Defense of Marriage Act, regarding state recognition of same-sex marriages entered into in other states. Kagan indicated that she would defend the act (DOMA) if "there was any reasonable basis to do so."

It really doesn't look that great with Kagan on the court now. She could have just said, during her confirmation hearings in Congress, that she could not discuss cases which could possibly reach the Supreme Court - that is what others, including Republican nominees have done as a matter of jurisprudence and court ethics in the past. But no, she had to suck up to the right-wingers -- now she's on the record opposing GLBT equal marriage rights before they have even reached the court.

Wow, nice judicial choice, Obama! But what did you expect from him and his non-confrontational, shortsighted, lack of decision-making skills anyway? He's such a screw-up and a really big disappointment to his progressive base. His signing on to the doomed "Respect for Marriage Act" is a farce; considering how the Bill would've even been a struggle in his first two years, but, today, with the House in Republican control, bringing this "dead-on-arrival" Bill up now is just an insult and an exploitation of the gullibility of the GLBT community. We deserved better, and, what's more, America deserved better from the Democratic Party, the party of Roosevelt and Truman. What a disaster for us all. This at a time when we truly need real leadership; not a vacillating, unreliable, dupliticous village idiot in the White House.

As the old saying goes: "The Republicans fear their base, while the Democrats despise their base."

Obama is the living embodiment of that axiom. More's the pity.



(c) Bud Evans, 2011

-------------------------------


About the cartoon caption illustrator, Kevin Moore:
Hope, Change and All That Crap — a new collection of In Contempt comic strips — is available for purchase through Lulu.com. The book collects strips published between August 2007 and January 2009.

Monday, July 18, 2011

And the Clock Just Keeps on a'Tickin'....

Learn more about

Monday, July 11, 2011

Maggie Gallagher: The Gluttony of Homophobia





[photo attribution to: http://www.queerty.com/what-will-margaret-srivastav-wear-to-patrick-leahys-historic-doma-hearings-20110707]


"Gluttony" from http://www.deadlysins.com/sins/gluttony.html

*What it is: Gluttony is an inordinate desire to consume more than that which one requires.

*Your punishment in Hell will be: You'll be force-fed rats, toads, and snakes.

*Associated symbols & such: Gluttony is linked with the pig and the color orange.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



> --- with some "enhancements" of my own added]




Hmmmmm...so, then according to Catholicism, and their Seven Deadly Sins contrivances, "gluttony" is listed as one of the worst sins ever.

Then, by inference, Maggie Gallagher is a first class porcine Satanic sinner. Therefore, all of us god-fearing, present day Sodom and Gomorrahites should shun her. It is our sacred duty as good cafeteria Christians.

To confirm this, I remember when I was a child, and when my mom ran out of Grimm's fairy-tales to scare the bejesus out of me before bedtime, she used to tell me bible stories. I remember the one about Sodom and Gomorrah and how it got accidentally destroyed. She told me that everyone was gay in the two towns, and how they had to adopt crack-babies because no one would do the ol' heterosexual "in and out" anymore.

God, realizing that the world would be vastly over-crowded in a few thousands years or so, and (God being God, you know) wanted to get a head-start on things, so He really liked the idea of at least some of His brood having non-reproductive sex and keeping things in balance. He even sent some male "trainer" angels for them to practice same-sex copulation with because the angels were getting really bored in heaven waiting for cable TV -- which hadn't been invented yet. But when Lot tried to pull a fast one by offering his daughters to the Sodom and Gomorrah Branch of the Log Cabin Republicans (one of the original lost tribes of Israel) for the men to White Party with instead of those devilishly handsome angels when they arrived -- well, the men would have none of it. Consequently, God got as mad as a parish priest without an altar-boy at Lot's betrayal and tried to destroyed Lot with a fire-bolt, but God missed and hit the twin cities instead.

Well, God was really pissed off by then and got his revenge by turning Lot's wife into a pillar of salt. God felt bad about it later and wanted to turn Lot into a Margarita (so that Lot and his wife could be together again), but there was this demon cow, named Maggus Gallagherus, who came along and, when no one was looking, licked the salt block all up until it disappeared. Lot became so distraught that he got drunk later and had sex with his two daughters (true, look it up) so that he could continue his family's line.

The rumors of Lot's incest with his daughters spread eventually, so Lot moved his daughter-wives and his grandchildren-kids to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania where he is now a disgraced "frothy mix" former United States Senator running for Grand Wizard of the United Confederate States of Amerika along with Rick "anti-christ" Perry and Michele "crazy eyes" Bachman. Together they have created the newly formed "Children of the Corn Party".

But what happened to Maggus Gallergerus, the sloth demon, you may ask? Well, she converted to Hinduism and was reincarnated as a Catholic in 20th century America. She now fights Sodom and Gommorahites in the US in the name of her former demon self since God will no longer feed her appetite by turning people into salt for her to lick. This salt deficiency in her diet caused her to form the organisation called NOM (Nasty Old Monsters) where she continues to scare little children and homosexuals, as well as the other pure and innocent offspring of God.

The moral of the story is, as my mother told me: "Steer clear of homophobic fat women, because they may have an agenda...or maybe they just don't feel pretty and want attention. Either way, if they attack you, throw some salt on the ground and run like hell."


...Gosh, I sure do miss those lovely old stories my mom told me when I was growing up as a kid. Those were good times. But I still find it hard to believe how anyone cannot trust in the unerring truth of the Bible through honest to goodness true stories like these in the Holy Book.

You got to believe. Exactly what else is there to have faith in -- Science or something? As surely as you can see Russia while standing on the back porch of my house in Kansas, you got to believe.

...You betcha.


(c) Rainfish2000

Thursday, June 30, 2011

We Liberal Independents Need a Progressive Version of the Tea Party



Without the fear of consequences from their constituents most politicians, like water, will take the path of least resistance. You get what you demand -- if you ask for little, that's what you'll get. If there is a negative price to be paid at the ballot box from any pro-active constituent group, then, believe me, that group will be appeased before an election.

The tide of history is on our side with more and more people joining in the movement towards a more perfect union. If we excuse our so-called leaders for not supporting us openly, then why should anyone else feel motivated to do the right thing? Should we expect more commitment to our cause from our co-workers and neighbors and from those who do not know us than we do from those we elect to public office to represent us? Changing hearts and minds is one thing, but to insist that those leaders, which we have elevated to positions of political power, to follow suit and, dare I say, lead on issues of historical significance -- is that really too much to expect?

Obama is a political weather vane without a moral center. He is incapable of leadership. More's the pity, really. He's a competent orator; too bad his carefully crafted, White House staff generated, words are just pandering poetic prose calculated to created a media image with no more lasting substance than the faint fading glow of a teleprompter.

And, no, claiming the "other guy" would be worst is no longer a good enough reason for giving this guy a free pass. The battered housewife syndrome kind of relationship which some in the GLBT community have had (and still have) with the Democratic Party is getting really tiresome. Enablers do not deserve pity nor any semblance of respect.

Third parties and Independents can, and do, win state and local elections, such as former Connecticut governor Lowell Weicker. Some have even won federal elections: witness Sen. Bernie Sanders of VT (a proud independent socialist for god sake) and Sen. Joe Lieberman. What about the Tea Party (an independent extremist right-wing subset of Republicans) who, although small in numbers, basically controls the House of Representatives by setting the agenda? Anything is possible, if you are motivated enough and have enough people to just say -- let's do it.

Mark Halperin calls Obama a Dick on Morning Joe -- June 30, 2011





...Ok, maybe he is. But, poor Mary Landrieu...was that really necessary?

Read on the link below about how ol' Marky "Snark" Halperin photo-shopped a picture of Louisiana Sen. Mary Landrieu with semen in her hair simulating a scene involving Cameron Diaz from "There's Something About Mary". ...Yep, a real class act.




Click on link below:
http://crooksandliars.com/logan-murphy/mark-halperins-photopshop-flop-senato


Tuesday, June 28, 2011

WE WIN!!!! Marriage Equality Comes to One of the Biggest States in the USA


Full Equality is Born and Stands as a Beacon of Hope For Tens of Millions in the GLBT Community in Yet Another Free State in the USA. Congratulations New York For Embodying Those True American Principles of Liberty and Justice for All!




Grow a Spine Obama and Show Just a Little Bit of the Courage That Truman Did in 1948


Read a little bit of history from texts which I cobbled together below, then ask yourself how Harry Truman found the courage to desegregate the US Military, during his election year, when vast numbers of white voters were against it? Where is Obama’s leadership regarding the last group of citizens in America, the GLBT community, to suffer government mandated discrimination? Why wont he even come out and give tacit support to marriage equality when the majority of Americans already do so?

See how a real President led a nation with courage and commitment towards what was the correct moral choice regarding equality and who did not just follow his own distorted internal prognostications and politically paralyzing fears like Obama.

————————-

“Tales of the abuse, violence, and persecution suffered by many African American veterans upon their return from World War II infuriated Truman, and were a major factor in his decision to issue Executive Order 9981, in July 1948, to back civil rights initiatives and require equal opportunity in the armed forces.

At the 1948 Democratic National Convention, Truman attempted to calm turbulent domestic political waters by placing a tepid civil rights plank in the party platform; the aim was to assuage the internal conflicts between the northern and southern wings of his party. Events overtook the president’s efforts at compromise, however. A sharp address given by Mayor Hubert Humphrey of Minneapolis — as well as the local political interests of a number of urban bosses — convinced the Convention to adopt a stronger civil rights plank, which Truman approved wholeheartedly. All of Alabama’s delegates, and a portion of Mississippi’s, walked out of the convention in protest. Unfazed, Truman delivered an aggressive acceptance speech attacking the 80th Congress and promising to win the election and “make these Republicans like it.”

Within two weeks, Truman issued Executive Order 9981, racially integrating the U.S. Armed Services. Truman took considerable political risk in backing civil rights, and many seasoned Democrats were concerned that the loss of Dixiecrat support might destroy the Democratic Party. The fear seemed well justified — Strom Thurmond declared his candidacy for the presidency and led a full-scale revolt of Southern “states’ rights” proponents. This revolt on the right was matched by a revolt on the left, led by former Vice President Henry A. Wallace on the Progressive Party ticket. Immediately after its first post-FDR convention, the Democratic Party found itself disintegrating. Victory in November seemed a remote possibility indeed, with the party not simply split but divided three ways.

Most civilians and military personnel opposed racial integration. One month before President Truman’s Executive Order, a Gallup poll showed that 63% of American adults endorsed the separation of Blacks and Whites in the military; only 26% supported integration. A 1949 survey of white Army personnel revealed that 32% completely opposed racial integration in any form, and 61% opposed integration if it meant that Whites and Blacks would share sleeping quarters and mess halls. However, 68% of white soldiers were willing to have Blacks and Whites work together, provided they didn’t share barracks or mess facilities.


As the 1993 RAND report noted:

“Many white Americans (especially Southerners) responded with visceral revulsion to the idea of close physical contact with blacks. Many also perceived racial integration as a profound affront to their sense of social order. Blacks, for their part, often harbored deep mistrust of whites and great sensitivity to any language or actions that might be construed as racial discrimination” (National Defense Research Institute, 1993, p. 160).

Truman went on to win his second term (1949–1953) as President after having assumed the office, after the death of Roosevelt, from 1945 to 1948.”

Primary Research source… http://psychology.ucdavis.edu/.....story.html

—————————————-

MY TAKE ON IT:

It boggles the mind to imagine this current invertebrate in the White House, with obvious commitment issues, being willing to take a stand on any issue without soiling his underpants. Yet, he comes to New York during one of the most historic events in our movement and has the gall to ask both for handouts and for the GLBT community’s full political support, while he steadfastly refuses to openly support our community in return. He must really think that we are nothing but a bunch of saps and rubes who just fell off a turnip truck.

And he’s probably right because we let him take us for granted without demanding anything in return and by not threatening consequences like any other self-respecting constituent group would if they were offered anything less than full representation and honest advocacy for their issues.

All of this just begs the question: How many times do the Democrats have to lose before they start to fear their voter base as much as the Republicans do? It’s all about demanding accountability; nothing more.

Tuesday, June 21, 2011

My Fine Art Posters

* Click HERE to go to my Fine Arts Print Gallery...

YES, YOU CAN MAKE IT BETTER PRESIDENT OBAMA ~ by "Bud" E. Lewis Evans



Yes, things will "get better" when we actually have people (especially a president) in a leadership position with a genuine soul, coupled with a heart and a brain, to guide this Byzantine disaster of nation. Political cowardice and partisan paranoia has trumped real leadership in America. Today, we have nothing but inflatable candidates made large than life by mass media hype and then anchored down, like Macy's Thanksgiving Parade balloons, by corporate interests and Political Party Machine manipulations.

The last president we had with a true sense of honor was Harry Truman who went over Pentagon heads, and his own party, as well as being contrary to the will of the vast majority of the general public when he desegregated the US Military. Lyndon Johnson could have been a great leader (as big as Roosevelt) if it had not been for his mistakes in Vietnam -- although he did give us medicare and medicaid, as well as the student grant and college loan program. Today, all we have are shallow duplicitous personifications of political ads in suits steering the country into the gutter of history and towards the inevitable fate of civilizations past their glory.

Get ready to learn to speak Chinese or Hindi if you want a job. In twenty years our major cities may quite possibly look like what old Calcutta, India did in the 1960s replete with beggars, and the only jobs available to US citizens will be pulling rigshaws for foreign tourists. Oh, but we will probably still have some sort of minority left to kick around and blame for our own premeditated decline.

I fear we have become just as deluded as the main character in Voltaire's book, "Candide", who kept insisting that "It is still the best of all possible worlds" even as one disaster after another befell him.

But, sometimes simply saying something is so just isn't enough, especially when it ignores what actually needs to be changed. Obama had a chance to do that, but he favors the status quo, and the GLBT community is a threat to that recalcitrant status quo which only has room to accommodate insecure conformists who so willingly bow down to fluctuating societal norms and entrenched corporate power hierarchies.

To people like Obama, who just want to fit in, we are an annoying reminder of his own minority status and a threat to his membership in the exclusive club he once thought he might be denied admission to. We are a bridge too far. A place he is not willing to go. And this is especially so if that advocacy for us should remind others in the White, heterosexual power structure that Obama is not actually one of them; not one of the "good old boys" either. I believe his capitulating to the military on stripping anti-discrimination provisions out the House DADT repeal bill is a prime example of that.

But this not a racial phenomena, there are members of the LGBT community who have also been known to sell out even their own kind in order to be granted access to power. GoProud and HRC immediately comes to mind.

So, Mr. President, don't simply tell all of our GLBT children at risk that "it only gets better"; rather, give them a reason to believe that claim by actually making it better. How could you do any less and still honor the high office you hold? I know that hackneyed phrase, "actions speak louder than words", has been bandied about a lot lately questioning your real commitment to civil rights, but sometimes actually doing something affirmative, instead of just talking about, may quite possibly have the side benefit of restoring people's faith in you.

Without a realization of results, your much vaulted "Audacity of Hope" message is nothing more than meaningless rhetoric. You owe more than that to the children of America, and especially to the only segment of children in America to have the ugly specter of government sanctioned discrimination lying in wait for them, like a bully after school, as they grow into adulthood.

President Johnson once said that his pushing the 1964 Civil Rights Act through Congress would doom the Democratic Party forever in the South, but he said that it was the right thing to do. Can you make that kind of commitment to our Civil Rights as well? GLBT children and adults in America need you to say, "yes I can" and then actually honor your commitments. We all chanted "yes we can" to get you elected, now it is your turn.

If there is no affirmative support from you for the unequivocal equal human rights for all American citizens, then there should only be a vote of no confidence for you. If you don't get the message; then you don't deserve to be in the high office you hold. No other issue is more important than human rights. That is what this country fought a revolutionary war over. That takes precedence over all other considerations. Without equality, nothing else matters. Nothing.

As an after thought -- I must say to those who will settle for next to nothing, because the alternative for them is to hard for them to bear -- remember, when you vote for the lesser of two evils, you still end up with evil. I'm not ready to sell my soul for that; if you are, then you don't deserve anybody's respect. At the risk of mixing metaphors, I must point out that it's the squeaky wheel that gets the grease, but if you put a sock in your own mouth no one will ever hear you. That doesn't make you safe, it just makes you irrelevant.


@ "Bud" E. Lewis Evans, 2011

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Elizabeth Taylor (February 27, 1932 – March 23, 2011) -- Dies at Age 79

~ Elizabeth Taylor circa 1953 ~



(for a great article on her life and her selfless contribution to the fight against AIDS, please click on this link at 365gay.com --http://www.365gay.com/news/elizabeth-taylor-screen-legend-pioneering-aids-activist-dies/ )

Thursday, February 24, 2011

Attorney General says DOMA is unconstitutional

...although, Obama pledges to still enforce unconstitutional DOMA in spite of his Oath of Office to uphold the Constitution.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Obama: Commander-in-Chief-Hypocrite



"Obama Warren"
Political Cartoon contribution/BuffyTheFundieSlayer


“The President has spoken out in opposition to Proposition 8 because it is divisive and discriminatory. He will continue to promote equality for LGBT Americans,” the White House said Wednesday night after the ruling and tried to clarify its position the following day. “The president does oppose same-sex marriage, but he supports equality for gay and lesbian couples..." Aug. 2010


http://wonkroom.thinkprogress.org/tag/same-sex-marriage/

“I favor legalizing same-sex marriages, and would fight efforts to prohibit such marriages,” Illinois State Sen. Obama said in an answer to a 1996 "Outlines" newspaper question on marriage -- before he became a lying, backstabbing, spineless weasel as President.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/13/obama-once-supported-same_n_157656.html

Saturday, December 18, 2010

In spite of Obama's Obstructionism -- Reid and Pelosi Finally Repeal DADT

After almost two years of Obama insisting that Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid put off repeal of DADT, and with very little involvement from the White House, Gay and Lesbian military personnel will eventually be able to serve openly to fight to the death for the freedoms they are still denied; which every other American takes so casually for granted.

Originally, the House bill had a non-discrimination clause attached to the legislation which would protect Gay and Lesbian military personnel from discrimination in the military or, at least, give them a legal tool in order to seek to remedy blatant acts of discrimination based on one's real or perceived sexual orientation in military such as being passed over for promotion and other forms of unequal treatment related to sexual orientation discrimination. Obama, at the urging of the Pentagon, demanded that the non-discrimination clause be removed from the final version of DADT. Apparently, Obama isn't ready for patriotic Gay and Lesbian Americans to be treated as equals and their rights of citizenship fully protected just yet.

Still, some Obama sycophants wonders why the Democratic Party's progressive base is repulsed by this duplicitous fraud in the White House. And, naturally, Obama has taken full credit for this stripped down and gutted repeal of DADT which will no doubt be "slow walked" into existence with plenty of inequities still left standing in place because of Obama's insistence that the non-discrimination clause be removed from the bill. This insult, as well as Barry's Department of inJustice via AG Holder's hypocritical and denigrating defense of DOMA in the federal courts had better be resolved if Obama has any hope whatsoever to see a second term as POTUS.

Monday, November 01, 2010

President Barack O'Bush Has No Sense of Decency or Shame Whatsoever


President Barack O'Bush
(single term in office: 2008 - 2012)

Please read at the link below how Obama's head of Office of Personnel Management, John Berry, the highest-ranking out gay official in this administration was required last year to ignore a federal court order to allow GLBT federal employees to buy health insurance from the federal government for their partners.

President Barack O'Bush has no sense of decency or shame whatsoever.

SOURCE: http://www.pamshouseblend.com/diary/14300/wh-defies-court-order-top-openly-gay-officials-dept-seeks-to-bar-partner-health-benefits

Photo Credit:
http://www.newworldorderwar.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/bush-obama.jpg

Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Scumbag Sacha Baron Cohen Tries to Incite a Riot Between Prop 8 Protesters

For all of you who may have thought that Sasha "Boring" Cohen's repulsive stereotyping of Gay men was all for "laughs" (while he took home some $139 million dollars in box office receipts by exploiting and degrading the GLBT community) ...well, check the video out below and ask yourself if you still think this troll is a comedic genius. If you do, then you may find yourself in the same company as the very few African Americans who found White men, in Black-face, doing Minstrel Shows a laugh riot singing "Mammy" for White bigots in 1920s Vaudeville. ~ Comment by Rainfish2000 .




Attribution and link to story courtesy, "Queerty" (click below for link):

http://www.queerty.com/sacha-baron-cohen-sued-by-gay-camera-man-for-turning-prop-8-rally-into-violent-joke-20101027/

Hangman (guess the word -- type a letter in the box below)